Flame, shame and symbols
Submitted by Vanessa Baird on April 7, 2008 - 1:29pm.
It couldn’t
have been more symbolic. We all strained to see the Olympic flame, barely
visible, ringed by a double band of Chinese security guards and British police
as it approached
‘Just look
at them!’ said a frail and elderly Londoner, balancing precariously on the wall
next to me. ‘We’ve become a police state!’ she added as officers fell upon individual
demonstrators who got over the barricades.
Inside No
10 Downing Street, Prime Minister Gordon Brown, was welcoming the Olympic torch
– and prudently avoiding all physical contact with it. You’d have thought it
was – well, not a torch but a bloodied torture baton. (See NI 408 Human Rights
Olympics)
But, hang
on! The Olympic Games are non-political – as leading politicians keep telling
us. Then why are they talking about it so much? And why did they jump on that
absurd torch relay PR bandwagon?
Perhaps
they know that it’s just not true. For the host country the Games are almost
inevitably political. In
Ask the
people living in occupied
As the
torch proceeds around the world, the symbolism will become even more poignant. It’s
due to cross the
What is
currently happening in the Tibetan region is, unfortunately, more than symbolism.
The repression has increased since the March protests which exiled groups say
resulted in 140 deaths. The Free Tibet Campaign reports that last week police
in
The
international focus on
But asked
to comment another Tibetan exile said: ‘I’m sorry. I can’t speak. I can’t talk
to you about this. We have lost so much’
That’s what
cultural genocide is about: the systematic destruction of everything that
matters to a people. And for Tibetans it’s been going on for almost six decades
now. (See NI 274)
Filed under:
Join over 10,000 people just like you. Get e-mail updates about new content, issue alerts, contests, and more!

Delicious
Digg
Technorati
Post new comment